Tuesday, July 6, 2010

People’s Institute of Pharmacy & Research Centre




People’s Institute of Pharmacy & Research Centre
Bhanpur, By-Pass road,
Bhopal-462037 (M.P.)

The aim of the People’s Institute of Pharmacy & Research Centre is committed to quality of education. Demand for well-qualified Pharmacy manpower is increasing day by day with the proliferation of many new companies and a greater demand for competent candidates in the Pharmaceutical sector is generated. Job opportunities for Pharmacy professionals have increased in India and abroad. Keeping this in view, the members of SJPN (Charitable Trust) have proposed to start People’s Institute of Pharmacy & Research Centre (PIP&RC) at Bhanpur, Bhopal, approx. 5.5 km from the Railway Station as well as Airport.





ABHINAMDAN

Amrit Singh

These titrations are based on complexation reactions.
Most often used reagent is EDTA - EthyleneDiamineTetraAcetic acid. There are also other similar chelating agents (EGTA, CDTA and so on) used. In some of other methods Ag+ is used as a titrant for determining cyanides and Hg2+ as a titrant in Cl- determination.
Changing property of the solution is usually the concentration of the complexed substance, although in some cases it can be much more convenient to express results in terms of titrant concentration. As its concentration changes by many orders of magnitude, and is almost always smaller than 1, we use negative logarithmic scale, similar to that used in pH definition.
In the case of determination of metals detection of the endpoint is mainly based on substances that change color when creating complexes with determined metals. One of these indicators is eriochrome black T, substance that in pH between 7 and 11 is blue when free, and black when forms a complex with metal, other examples are pyrocatechin violet and murexide. It is important that formation constant for these complexes is low enough, so that titrant reacts with complexed ions first.

Iodometry

Iodometry is one of the most important redox titration methods. Iodine reacts directly, fast and quantitively with many organic and inorganic substances. Thanks to its relatively low, pH independent redox potential, and reversibility of the iodine/iodide reaction, iodometry can be used both to determine amount of reducing agents (by direct titration with iodine) and of oxidizing agents (by titration of iodine with thiosulfate). In all cases the same simple and reliable method of end point detection, based on blue starch complex, can be used.
Reversible iodine/iodide reaction mentioned above is
2I- ↔ I2 + 2e-
and obviously whether it should be treated as oxidation with iodine or reduction with iodides depends on the other redox system involved.
Second important reaction used excesivelly in iodometry is reduction of iodine with thiosulfate:
2S2O32- + I2 → S4O62- + 2I-
In the case of both reactions it is better to avoid low pH. Thiosulfate is unstable in the presence of acids, and iodides in low pH can be oxidized by air oxygen to iodine. Both processes can be source of titration errors.
Iodine is very weakly soluble in the water, and can be easily lost from the solution due to its volatility. However, in the presence of excess iodides iodine creates I3- ions. This lowers free iodine concentration and such solutions are stable enough to be used in lab practice. Still, we should remember that their shelf life is relatively short (they should be kept tightly closed in dark brown bottles, and standardized every few weeks). Iodine solutions are prepared dissolving elemental iodine directly in the iodides solution. Elemental iodine can be prepared very pure through sublimation, but because of its high volatility it is difficult to weight. Thus use of iodine as a standard substance, although possible, is not easy nor recommended. Iodine solutions can be easily normalized against arsenic (III) oxide (As2O3) or sodium thiosulfate solution.
It is also possible to prepare iodine solutions mixing potassium iodide with potassium iodate in the presence of strong acid:
5I- + IO3- + 6H+ → 3I2 + 3H2O
Potassium iodate is a primary substance, so solution prepared this way can have exactly known concentration. However, this approach is not cost effective and in lab practice it is much better to use iodate as a primary substance to standardize thiosulfate, and then standardize iodine solution against thiosulfate.
end point detection with starch
Iodine in water solutions is usually colored strong enough so that its presence can be detected visually. However, close to the end point, when the iodine concentration is very low, its yellowish color is very pale and can be easily overlooked. Thus for the end point detection starch solutions are used.
Iodine gets adsorbed on the starch molecule surface and product of adsortion has strong, blue color. Exact mechanism behind adsorption and color change is not known, see for example this explanation of starch as an indicator usage.
In the presence of small amounts of iodine adsorption and desorption are fast and reversible. However, when the concentration of iodine is high, it gets bonded with starch relatively strong, and desorption becomes slow, which makes detection of the end point relatively difficult. Luckily high concentrations of iodine are easily visible, so if we are using thiosulfate to titrate solution that initially contains high iodine concentration, we can titrate till the solution gets pale and add starch close to the end point. In the case of titration with iodine solution we can add starch at the very beginning, as high iodine concentrations are not possible before we are long past the end point.
At the elevated temperatures adsorption of the iodine on the starch surface decreases, so titrations should be done in the cold.
Finally, it is worth of noting that starch solutions, containing natural carbohydrate, have to be either prepared fresh, or conserved with antibacterial agent like mercuric iodide HgI2.
Two most important solutions used in iodometric titrations are solution of iodine and solution of sodium thiosulfate. Both substances can be easily obtained in a pure form, but their other characteristics (volatility, hard to control amount of water of crystallization) make them difficult to use as a primary standards.
It is also worth of mentioning that both solutions are not quite stable and they can not be stored for a prolonged period of time. Iodine can be lost from the solution due to its volatility, while thiosulfate slowly decomposes giving off elemental sulfur. The latter process is easily visible, as thiosulfate solutions become slightly cloudy with time.
Iodine solution
It is not difficult to prepare high purity iodine through sublimation, but - due to its volatility - iodine is difficult to weight accurately, as it tends to run away. To minimize losses it should be weight in closed weighing bottle. Iodine should be kept in a closed bottles also because it is highly corrosive and it vapor can damage delicate mechanism of analytical balance.
Commonly used solutions are 0.05M (0.1 normal).
To find out amounts of substances required to prepare the solution for a needed volume use ChemBuddy concentration calculator. Download the iodine solution preparation file. Open it with the free trial version of the concentration calculator. After opening the file enter solution volume and click on the Show recipe button. Read amounts of the substances, but don't follow the general directions. It is better to use as small initial volume of the solution as possible, that is, dissolve potassium iodide in about 1/100th of the final volume of water, before adding iodine.
To minimalize losses it is important to transfer iodine to the solution as fast as possible, or even to weight a 1% excess. Solution should be kept in dark glass bottle with grinded glass stopper and standardized every few weeks or before use.
Sodium thiosulfate solution
Sodium thiosulafte can be realtively easily obtained in a pure form, but it is quite difficult to obtain samples with known amount of water of crystallization, as the exact composition of the solid is very temperature and humidity dependent. Thus solution has to be standardized against potassium iodate KIO3 or potassium dichromate.
Commonly used solutions are 0.1M (0.1 normal).
To prepare the recipe for a needed volume of the solution use ChemBuddy concentration calculator. Download the sodium thiosulfate solution preparation file. Open it with the free trial version of the concentration calculator. After opening the file enter solution volume and click on the Show recipe button.
Small amount of carbonate added helps keep solution pH above 7, which slows down thiosulfate decomposition. Some sources also call for addition of 0.5 mL chloform per liter of the solution, to stop possible growth of bacteria that can speed up decomposition process.
Starch solution
Starch solution is used for end point detection in iodometric titration.
To prepare starch indicator solution, add 1 gram of starch (either corn or potato) into 10 mL of distilled water, shake well, and pour into 100 mL of boiling, distilled water. Stir thoroughly and boil for a 1 minute. Leave to cool down. If the precipitate forms, decant the supernatant and use as the indicator solution. To make solution long lasting add a pinch of mercury iodide or salicylic acid, otherwise it can spoil after a few days.
2% sodium bicarbonate
This solution is used for neutralization of sodium arsenite, before it is titrated with iodine solution during iodine solution standardization.
0.05M iodine standardization against arsenic trioxide
Chemical characteristics of the arsenic trioxide As2O3 make it a good candidate for a standard substance in many potentiometric methods, however, because of its toxicity it is used less and less frequently.
Arsenic oxide is dissolved in sodium hydroxide, producing sodium arsenite, which is a good reducing agent. In iodometry it is quantitatively oxidized by iodine to arsenate:
Na3AsO3 + I2 + H2O → Na3AsO4 + 2I- + 2H+
Direction of this reaction depends on pH - in acidic solutions As(V) is able to oxidize iodides to iodine. To guarantee correct pH of the solution we will add solution of sodium bicarbonate NaHCO3.
Interestingly, when using As2O3 as a standard substance in other types of redox titrations, we often add small amount of iodide or iodate to speed up the reaction. For obvious reasons in the case of iodometric titration we don't have to.
Procedure to follow:
Weight exactly about 0.15-0.20g of dry arsenic trioxide and transfer it to Erlenmayer flask.
Add 10 mL of 1M sodium hydroxide solution and dissolve solid.
Add a drop of phenolphthalein solution.
Neutralize with 0.5M sulfuric acid, adding several drops of excess acid after solution loses its color.
Add slowly (to not cause the solution to foam up) 50 mL of 2% NaHCO3 solution.
Add 5 mL of the starch solution.
Titrate swirling the flask, until a blue color persists for 20 seconds.
To calculate iodine solution concentration use EBAS - stoichiometry calculator. Download iodine standardization against arsenic trioxide reaction file, open it with the free trial version of the stoichiometry calculator.
Note, that to be consistent with the use of arsenic trioxide and its molar mass, reaction equation is not the one shown above, but
As2O3 + 2I2 + 5H2O → 2AsO43- + 4I- + 10H+
These are equivalent. Enter arsenic troxide mass in the upper (input) frame in the mass edit field above As2O3 formula. Click n=CV button below iodine in the output frame, enter volume of the solution used, read solution concentration

Potentiometric titrations



These titrations are based on redox reactions.
There are many redox reagents used in redox titrations. To list a few - potassium permanganate is used for determination of Fe2+, H2O2 and oxalic acid. Potassium dichromate for determination of Fe2+ and Cu in CuCl. Bromate is used for tin and phenol, iodides (titrated with sodium thiosulfate) for H2O2 and Cu2+. Cerium (IV) can be used to determine ferrocyanides and nitrites. There are also many other methods.
Changing property of the solution is its redox potential.
Commonly used indicators are substances that can exist in two forms - oxidized and reduced - that differ in color. Potential at which the substance changes color must be such that the change occurs close to the equivalence point. Examples of such substances are ferroin, diphenylamine or nile blue. Sometimes indicators that are oxidized irreversibly are used. However, in most popular redox titrations there is no need for a special indicator - permanganate has strong color by itself, iodine gives strong color when combined with starch, so their presence or disappearance can be easily detected without additional indicators.




Many things that have been told about use of indicators in acid-base titration hold also for potentiometric titrations. The higher the concentration of the titrated substance and the titrant, the longer the steep part of the titration curve and the easier the redox indicator selection. In the case of one color indicators, potential at which indicator color starts to be visible depends on the indicator concentration. Depending on the situation we should either titrate to the full change of color or to the first visible change of color - and so on.
However, there are also important differences. The most obvious one is - while the general idea that observed color depends on the ratio of concentrations of both reduced and oxidized forms still holds, ratio of concentrations is not pH dependent, but redox potential dependent. We can easily calculate ratio of the concentrations of both forms using Nernst equation:

Let's assume - as we did in the case of pH indicators - that for the complete color change we have to move from 10:1 to 1:10 concentration ratio. That means we have to move from the potential

at 25 °C (more precisely it should be 118.2 mV, but as we started with an approximate rule 10:1 to 1:10, such accuracy is not necessary). This is a useful rule of thumb - 120 mV will be enough always. For many indicators reaction requires 2 electrons, so 60 mV change is enough for the observable color change.
Table below contains some of the popular redox indicators. Note, that reduced forms of many indicators are colorless - that means, that indicator concentration plays important role. Also note, that many of these substances are weak acids/bases, thus formal potentials of their reactions can depend on the solution pH. Some of these substances are even used as pH indicators, so their color depends both on the pH and redox potential of the system, which makes selecting them even more complicated.

Interestingly, in the case of three popular potentiometric titrations we usually don't use redox indicators, but specific indicators, that work only in the case of these methods.
In the case of permanganometry there is no need for indicator - small excess of permanganate is immediately visible, as the permanganate itself has a very strong color. As we need some excess of the titrant, it makes sense to start with a blank test, to check what volume of excess titrant has to be added before the color change can be spotted.
In the case of iodometric titration, we use starch. Free iodine adsorbs at the starch surface, changing its color to blue. Depending on the titration type (and titrant) starch will either allow determination of the first traces of excess iodine, or determination of the moment when last traces of iodine disappear. In the latter case it is important to add starch close to the endpoint, as product of the iodine-starch reaction created when iodine concentration is high is relatively stable. Iodine itself is colored and its solutions are yellow, but intensity of the color is usually too low to be useful for endpoint detection.
In the case of bromine titration we can use methyl orange as an indicator - once the excess free bromine appears in the solution, it will oxidize the indicator and solution turns colorless. This is an example of application of irreversible redox indicator.
If you want to select an indicator for your method, you can try approach similar to that described in the acid-base titration end point detection section - calculate redox potential of your system for 99.9% and 100.1% titration and choose an indicator that changes color between these values.

Titration

Titration


Titration is a laboratory method of quantitative analysis used to determine unknown concentration of known substance.
Analysis is performed using burette - kind of laboratory glass made for exact measurement of volume of solution used.
The most popular titrimetric experiment is a determination of amount of acid.
Imagine you have a solution of a sulfuric acid of unknown concentration.
Pour exactly measured volume of sulfuric acid (VH2SO4) into a beaker and add few drops of alcoholic phenolphtalein solution. Solution will be colorless, as phenolphtalein becomes pink only in basic solutions (color becomes visible at pH above 8.2).
Now use burette to slowly add NaOH solution (called titrant) of known molar concentration CNaOH. pH slowly goes up. Once all sulfuric acid becomes neutralized one excess drop of strong base is enough to rapidly change pH of the solution and change its color to pink.


(Color change of phenolphthalein during titration - on the left, colorless solution before end point, on the right - pink solution after end point. )
When the color of the solution changes you know that you have neutralized all acid present - you have reached a titration end point. Using burette scale you may read volume of the titrant used (VNaOH).
We know that one mole of H2SO4 reacts with exactly two moles of NaOH:
2NaOH + H2SO4 → Na2SO4 + 2H2O
As we know that amount of substance of a given concentration in given volume of solution is n=C×V, we can write:
1 where 2 is a coefficient reflecting stoichiometry of the reaction equation. There is only one unknown in this equation:
2 So we have just determined concentration of unknown concentration of sulfuric acid.
Such stoichiometric calculation is the basis of all volumetric analytical methods. They differ when it comes to reagents used and methods of determination of the end point, but the general idea is always the same.
A volumetric determination can be no better than the equipment and technique used in performing it.

Acid-base titrations

Acid-base titrations
Acid-base titrations are based on the neutralization reaction. They are sometimes called alkalimetric titrations and general name of the method is alkalimetry, although these are not used as often as just "acid-base titration".
Acid-base titrations can be used to determine most acids and bases, strong and not too weak, monoprotic and polyprotic. For example we can use acid-base titration to determine concentration of hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, acetic acid, as well as bases - like sodium hydroxide, ammonia and so on. In some particular cases, when solution contains mixture of acids or bases of different strengths, it is even possible to determine in one titration composition of a mixture - for example sodium hydroxide and sodium hydrogen carbonate. Using acid-base back titration it is also possible to determine amount of substances that can be easily dissolved in acids, like calcium carbonate. To do so we would add known amount of hydrochloric acid to calcium carbonate and after the solid is dissolved we would titrate excess acid with a strong base.
Most commonly used reagents are hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide. Solutions of hydrochloric acid are stable, solutions of sodium hydroxide can dissolve glass and absorb carbon dioxide from the air, so they should be not stored for long periods of time.
There are many standard substances that can be used in acid base titrations. Those most popular are sodium carbonate Na2CO3, borax (disodium tetraborate decahydrate) Na2B4O7·10H2O and potassium hydrogen phthalate KHC8H4O4, often called simply KHP.
Type of indicator depends on several factors. One of them is the equivalence point pH. Depending on the titrated substance and titrant used this can vary, usually between 4 and 10. However, even if it is often possible (see list of pH indicators) we are rarely selecting indicator that changes color exactly at the equivalence point, as usually increase of accuracy doesn't justify additional costs. Thus in practice you will probably use phenolphtalein when NaOH is used as the titrant and methyl orange when titrating with the strong acid.
Remember, that what we calculate is not end point - but equivalence point.
In the equivalence point we have solution containing pure salt that is a product of the neutralization reaction occurring during titration. Thus calculation of equivalence point pH is identical with calculation of pH of salt solution.
Depending on the type of titration there are at least three different cases to discuss.
In the case of titration of strong acid with strong base (or strong base with strong acid) there is no hydrolysis and solution pH is neutral - 7.00 (at 25°C).
In the case of titration of weak acid with strong base, pH at the equivalence point is determined by the weak acid salt hydrolysis. That means we have to find pKb of conjugated base and calculate concentration of OH- starting from there, then use pH=14-pOH formula. See pH of weak acids and bases lecture and pH cheat sheet for details of calculation.
In the case of titration of weak base with strong acid, situation is very similar - pH at the equivalence point is determined by the weak base salt hydrolysis. Thus we need pKa of conjugated acid to calculate H+ and pH. Check lecture and cheat sheet mentioned above for details.
In the case of polyprotic acids and bases calculations get much harder. You may try to follow methods described in the lecture on polyprotic acids and bases pH calculation, or you may use BATE - pH calculator.
Calculate pH at the equivalence point of formic acid titration with NaOH, assuming both titrant and titrated acid concentrations are 0.1 M. pKa = 3.75.
At the equivalence point we have a solution of sodium formate. As both concentrations of titrated acid and titrant are identical, and monoprotic formic acid reacts 1:1 with sodium hydroxide, we have to add identical volume of base to the given volume of acid. That in turn means that final volume is twice that of initial volume of acid sample, so after dilution concentration of formate must be half that of acid - that is 0.05 M.
We have titrated weak acid, so to calculate pH we have to calculate concentration of OH- from formate hydrolysis first. Formate is a weak base with
1
Let's try to use the most simplified formula first:
2
Using 10-10.25 and 0.05 we get
3
To be sure we can use the simplified formula we have to check, whether hydrolysis was below 5%. To do so, we should divide concentration of OH- by initial concentration of formate. That means
4
Obviously assumption about low hydrolysis degree is correct, and we can proceed with calculation of pOH:
5
and pH:
6
What is pH at the equivalence point of 0.0211 M H2SO4 titrated with 0.01120 M NaOH?
7.0
OK, that was very short answer, now a little bit longer one. This is case of strong acid titrated with strong base, so we expect pH at equivalence point to be that of neutral solution - that is, 7.00. In reality the answer will be slightly different. Three reasons for that. First, sulfuric acid has pKa1 = -3 (very strong acid) but second dissociation step has pKa2 = 2.0, so it is much weaker. Still strong, but weak enough so that its hydrolysis can't be ignored, especially in more concentrated solutions. Second, NaOH - while strong base - is much weaker than it is commonly assumed, with pKb = 0.2 (see pKb of NaOH in ChemBuddy FAQ for details), so in precise calculations its hydrolysis can't be neglected as well. Finally, there is a reason that we are ignoring in all our examples, but that can't be neglected in the real lab - that is, activity coefficients of all ions involved are not 1 (more on that in ChemBuddy lecture on ionic strength and activity coefficients). If we take all these things into account we can calculate pH of the solution to be 7.05, close enough to 7.0.